THE DEFINITIVE GUIDE TO IMMIGRATION LAW CASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

The Definitive Guide to immigration law case management system

The Definitive Guide to immigration law case management system

Blog Article

In addition on the primary punishment, the court may impose a fine about the offender. The fine’s amount is in the discretion from the court and is meant to function an additional deterrent.

fourteen. Inside the light from the position explained higher than, it can be concluded that a civil servant incorporates a fundamental right being promoted even after his retirement by awarding proforma promotion; provided, his right of promotion accrued during his service but could not be viewed as for no fault of his individual and meanwhile he retired on attaining the age of superannuation without any shortcoming on his part about deficiency within the duration of service or inside the form of inquiry and departmental action was so taken against his right of promotion. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 269 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

4.       Record shows that the petitioner is booked in as much as 8 criminal cases under the same offence with different complainants and involving sizable amounts of money. These cases span over the years 2018 to 2020 and three cases have been registered after the registration of the instant case. Although the petitioner has obtained bail in People cases, it does, prima facie, set up that the petitioner is susceptible to repeating the offence.

Some bodies are given statutory powers to issue guidance with persuasive authority or similar statutory effect, such as the Highway Code.

The claimed recovery could be used, within the most, for corroboration of the main evidence, but by itself it cannot be described as a basis for conviction. They further submitted that the petitioners Bhoora and Mst. Mubeena Bibi also pointed out the place of occurrence. The mentioned memo of pointation is irrelevant and inadmissible as nothing was discovered as a result of such pointation. The place of occurrence as well as the place of throwing the dead body were already within the knowledge of witnesses before their pointation through the petitioners. Reliance can be placed on case regulation titled as “Ijaz Ahmad and Another v. The State” (1997 SCMR 1279) wherein it's been held from the august Supreme Court of Pakistan as under:

کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟

Retribution: Section 302 PPC also serves the purpose of retribution, where society seeks justice with the loss of the life. It allows the legal system to impose a proportional punishment over the offender, making certain These are held accountable for their actions.

The appellant should have remained vigilant and raised his challenge for the Judgment within time. Read more

The Court directed the Chief Secretary of Sindh to ensure the Act's effective implementation in line with its original purpose and called for educational programs Bachelor degree(s) in the subject of cooperative societies. Read more

This public interest litigation came before the Supreme Court of Pakistan when petitioners challenged the construction of a nearby electricity grid station on account of probable health risks and dangers.

Preserving Social Order: By imposing strict penalties for murder, Section 302 PPC reinforces the principle of social order and stability. It demonstrates the commitment with the state to protect its citizens and copyright the rule of regulation.

, which is Latin for “stand by decided matters.” This means that a court will be bound to rule in accordance with a previously made ruling about the same here type of case.

104 . Const. P. 1832/2019 (D.B.) Muhammad Fakhar ul Hasnain V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is actually perfectly founded now that the provision for proforma promotion is not alien or unfamiliar to the civil servant service structure but it is already embedded in Fundamental Rule seventeen, wherein it can be lucidly enumerated that the appointing authority may perhaps if contented that a civil servant who was entitled to get promoted from a particular date was, for no fault of his own, wrongfully prevented from rendering service towards the Federation/ province within the higher post, direct that this kind of civil servant shall be paid the arrears of pay and allowances of this sort of higher post through proforma promotion or upgradation arising from the antedated fixation of his/her seniority. Read more

This section specifically applies to civil servants that are rendered surplus due to reorganization or abolition of the division, department, or office. Non-civil servants, by definition, usually are not subject matter for the provisions on the Civil Servants Act. Their terms and conditions of service are typically governed by separate contracts or agreements with the using organization. Therefore, the provisions of Section eleven-A, such as the possibility of being posted to another department, would not utilize to non-civil servants. Read more

Report this page